Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Bunnell v. MBM Delivery and Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Todd Bunnell
Defendant:
MBM Delivery and Logistics, LLC, DHL Express (USA) Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Exel Inc. v. Lewis Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00513
Defendant:
Lewis Electrical Contractors, Inc,, Marcobay Construction, Inc., MTU American Inc. d/b/a MTU Onsite Energy and others
Plaintiff:
EXEL INC. d/b/a DHL SUPPLY CHAIN and Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cross Defendant:
MTU American Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Interested Lloyds Underwriters v. DHL Global Forwarding
as 1:2020cv22065
Defendant:
DHL Global Forwarding, Danzas Corporation and Danzas Corporation a Foreign Corporation doing business as DHL Global Forwarding
Plaintiff:
Interested Lloyd's Underwriters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Clay v. DHL Supply Chain
as 1:2019cv03922
Plaintiff:
Roshieka Clay
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
