Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Porter v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2018cv01253
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Porter
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Ocwen Loan Servicing
as 1:2016cv04759
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Porter
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Davis et al v. Olens et al
as 1:2016cv02132
Defendant:
Sam Olens, David Cooke, Jr., Donald R. Donovan and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Davis, Dustin W. Tate, Richard Cosden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Porter et al
as 1:2015cv04507
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Jennifer Hendee, Ronnie K. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03518
Plaintiff:
Chris B. Chatman
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Daniel J. Porter and Richard Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03346
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Ronnie K. Batchelor, Daniel J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv02883
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush et al v. The State et al
as 1:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush and Recardo Wimbush
Defendant:
The State, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv03797
Petitioner:
Jorge Vasquez Padilla
Respondent:
Warren Davis, Daniel J. Porter, Jamie L. Smith, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
