Cases 11 - 20 of 198
SHANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05556
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD SHANLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOGGESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD LEE BOGGESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODRICH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23120
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GOODRICH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12443
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD JONES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Hernando County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grimes
Defendant:
Major Klucznic, T. Griffin and FNU Teele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashworth v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv21564
Plaintiff:
James Edward Emery and Janice Ashworth
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILBANKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05464
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD WILBANKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MANEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HITCHCOCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD HITCHCOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25180
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
