Cases 11 - 20 of 259
CARLISLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
JOHN M CARLISLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Bonnie T. Baker and John M. Baker
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12591
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11890
Plaintiff:
JOHN M BRYANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODMAN v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GOODMAN, BRANDON KOENIG-MESSER, RYAN LOIBL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10879
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HUGHES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans et al
as 6:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Defendant:
The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans, Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05579
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. ROSA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYS v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv60089
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HAYS
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
JOHN M WHITE JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
