Cases 11 - 20 of 243
Pharmaseek, LLC v. Romark Global Pharma, LLC et al
as 8:2023mc00006
Plaintiff:
Pharmaseek, LLC
Defendant:
Romark Global Pharma, LLC and Romark, L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Ruiz-Alfonso v. Dominion Tower, L.C.
as 1:2023cv20281
Plaintiff:
Ariel Ruiz-Alfonso
Defendant:
Dominion Tower, L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. Miami Wheelz, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60950
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
MIAMI WHEELZ, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as DUBS AND TIRES and L.A.W. HALLANDALE 30, L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
L.C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
