Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Howard v. Bolling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01460
Petitioner: Michael Lamar Howard
Respondent: Leon Bolling, III and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Michael Sweat
as 16-16030
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LAMAR SWEAT
Howard v. McVeigh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff: Michael Lamar Howard
Defendant: Brian McVeigh, Gus W. Colvin, Brian P Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. COLVIN
as 4:2015cv00252
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LAMAR BROWN
Defendant: CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Howard v. Warden, et al
as 14-15498
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL LAMAR HOWARD
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
USA v. Michael Sweat We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-14461
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LAMAR SWEAT
Sims v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00313
Petitioner: Michael Lamar Sims
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howard v. Patterson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04185
Petitioner: Michael Lamar Howard
Respondent: Tony Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Anthony v. USA
as 12-13730
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL LAMAR ANTHONY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv24386
Plaintiff: Michael Lamar Anthony
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?