Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 157
MURILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02479
Plaintiff: SHARON MURILLO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murillo v. Chocolate Fashion, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv23353
Plaintiff: ZOHILA MURILLO
Defendant: CHOCOLATE FASHION, INC. and Perseverania Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MURILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23679
Plaintiff: JAVIER MURILLO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21491
Plaintiff: ADAN MURILLO, JR.
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURILLO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06616
Plaintiff: JULIAN MURILLO
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murillo v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14206
Plaintiff: Santiago Murillo
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURILLO-RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03411
Plaintiff: IGNACIO MURILLO-RAMOS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Luis v. Stone
as 3:2023cv00005
Petitioner: Murillo Cabezas Luis
Respondent: Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amilka Hurtado v. USA
as 22-13596
Petitioner / Appellant: AMILKA MURILLO HURTADO
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hurtado v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02284
Plaintiff: Amilka Murillo Hurtado
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?