Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Johnson et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Johnson and Karen Isom Botteicher
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robidoux et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 2:2018cv14146
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henry Robidoux and Melissa Gil Robidoux
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sheehan v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sheehan and Robert Sheehan
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and United Service Protection, Inc.,
Mediator:
Peter Grilli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In Re: Refine Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv20110
Plaintiff:
Refine Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morales v. Corporate Coaches, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62359
Defendant:
Casino Limo Corp., Corporate Coaches, Inc., Andrew R. Bardar and others
Plaintiff:
Candido Morales, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
HAWKINS-KIMMEL v. THOR MOTOR COACH INC et al.
as 3:2017cv00648
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HAWKINS-KIMMEL
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH INC , K&C RV CENTERS LLC and EMERALD COAST RV CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Efkarpides v. Corporate Coaches, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60840
Plaintiff:
Polychronis George Efkarpides
Defendant:
Corporate Coaches, Inc., Casino Limo Corp. and Andrew R. Bardar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Efkarpides v. Corporate Coaches, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60839
Plaintiff:
Polychronis George Efkarpides
Defendant:
Corporate Coaches, Inc. , Casino Limo Corp. and Andrew R. Bardar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
