Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NESMITH v. COX ENTERPRISES INC
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W NESMITH
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BLANCHFIELD v. COX ENTERPRISES, INC
as 3:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
CHERYL BLANCHFIELD
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Marc Davidson, et al
as 10-14305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COX ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC L. DAVIDSON, JULIA DAVIDSON TRUILO and ROBERT TRUILO
:
SERVICE
Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
as 10-14240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COX ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Interested Party - Appellant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, United States Government Agency
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Dixon v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2009cv00938
Plaintiff:
Donald Dixon and Donald Dixon
Defendant:
James C. Kennedy, James C. Kennedy, James C. Kennedy and others
Movant:
John H. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
STROBO v. COX ENTERPRISES INC
as 3:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
RON STROBO
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Duke et al v. Cox Enterprises Inc
as 5:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Patti Duke, Patti Duke, Bobby Bowick and others
Defendant:
Cox Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox Enterprises,Inc. v. Kaney
as 6:2007cv01289
Plaintiff:
Cox Enterprises,Inc. and Cox Enterprises,Inc.
Defendant:
Jonathan D. Kaney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
