Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LYONS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25264
Plaintiff:
DAVID M LYONS and DAVID MICHAEL LYONS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WORN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24930
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL WORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20520
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAFEVER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19739
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL LAFEVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FCCI Insurance Company v. Crowe et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jonathan A Crowe, David Dylan Carpenter, David Michael Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MACHALEK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12700
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL MACHALEK and DAVID M MACHALEK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CATLETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09970
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL CATLETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOLENDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08647
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL BOLENDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
