Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Dill et al v. S Harbor City, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62022
Plaintiff:
Yanet Veronica Dill and Craig Dill
Defendant:
S Harbor City, Inc. and Randy Herscovici
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
FEDD v. ARRENDALE STATE PRISON
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
NEOTHA FEDD
Defendant:
ARRENDALE STATE PRISON
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Paavola
as 9:2022mc81611
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dill, Timothy Lorito, Yahina Vargas and others
Defendant:
Michelle Paavola
DILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20096
Plaintiff:
TODD JOSEPH DILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schoicket v. Dills
as 1:2022cv03908
Petitioner:
Rebecca D. Schoicket
Respondent:
Warden Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Dills
as 3:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
Holly Harvey
Respondent:
Warden Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Dill et al
as 6:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
steven m. dill, Steven M. Dill as personal representative of the Estate of Gladys R. Dill and Steven M. Dill, in his representative capacity of Gladys R. Dill Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
DILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08787
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hammitt v. Dills
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kipling Lee Hammitt
Defendant:
Warden Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02663
Plaintiff:
KAREN JOANN DILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
