Cases 21 - 30 of 68
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13796
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Wilfrido Florez-Montano
as 20-14023
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFRIDO FLOREZ-MONTANO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FLOREZ v. EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC
as 5:2020cv00210
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FLOREZ
Defendant:
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC and EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75905
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GIL FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Florez v. Workforce Solution Staffing, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv22766
Defendant:
Fernando De La Cruz, Workforce Solution Staffing, LLC and Martha De La Cruz
Plaintiff:
Diana Florez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBEIRO FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35666
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE R FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52050
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLOREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOREZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46942
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERMAN FLOREZ JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
