Cases 21 - 30 of 168
ANDERSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2008cv00013
Petitioner:
JOHN HAMPTON ANDERSON
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ASH v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2008cv00029
Petitioner:
EDDIE ASH
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURRY v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2008cv00012
Petitioner:
JAMES C CURRY
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2008cv00003
Petitioner:
KEVIN M TAYLOR
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNIGHT v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00545
Petitioner:
JAMES HENRY KNIGHT
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KANILI v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00537
Petitioner:
ATUNDO KANILI
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Mathis et al
as 3:2007cv01196
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Mathew McQueen
Defendant:
E.M. Mathis, L. P. Haddock, Pamela Y. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00282
Plaintiff:
VINCENT HOWARD
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, R FLORES, B KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Melton v. State Of Florida et al
as 1:2007cv23046
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Melton
Respondent:
State Of Florida, Attorney General of the State of Florida and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davorn v. Crosby et al
as 3:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Davis Julius Davorn
Defendant:
James V Crosby, James R. McDonough, Pilar Tournau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
