Cases 21 - 30 of 325
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
JAMES NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
DAVID W NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
GREGORY NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARRETT NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADKINS et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
TODD ADKINS, TEMITOPE AMUSA, JULIO AVILA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24071
Plaintiff:
MCKENDLEY NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newton v. Beary et al
as 6:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hal Newton
Defendant:
Kevin E. Beary and Elizabeth Weathers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61580
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Newton
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Newton v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61577
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Newton
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Newton v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61581
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Newton
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
