Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Berman v. The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC et al
as 1:2011cv20673
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Berman
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC , The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC et al
as 1:2011cv20623
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Gibson
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC , The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrison v. The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC et al
as 1:2011cv20621
Plaintiff:
Shari Baker Garrison
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Distributing LLC , The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Proctor & Gamble Company, The
as 2:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Powell
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company, The
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired
Calton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton and others
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, KAZ, Incorporated and KAZ USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired
Russo v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv21646
Plaintiff:
Lee Russo and Andew Russo
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare L.L.C., Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Strosnider v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Julius Mark Strosnider
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, The Trustees of the Proctor & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy and The Proctor & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
