Cases 21 - 30 of 718
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stinson v. Highwoods Property, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02252
Plaintiff:
Janice Stinson
Defendant:
Highwoods Property, Inc. a Foreign Corporation d/b/a Suntrust Financial Centre, and Highwood Services, Inc. C, Daniel E. Woodward, Lisa Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUIST BANK v. GOLDEN DOUGHNUTS ENTERPRISES, INC et al
as 5:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Holland Hoyt Haynie, Jr., Golden Doughnuts Enterprises, Inc., H. Hoyt Haynie and others
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company, successor by merger to SunTrust Bank, a North Carolina state chartered bank, TRUIST BANK and BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03466
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Craton Event Management, LLC et al v. Suntrust Bank
as 1:2021cv02985
Plaintiff:
Craton Event Management, LLC, Craton Promotions, Inc., Craton Event MGMT LLC and others
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Appel v. Wolf
as 1:2021mi00062
Respondent:
Robert S. Wolf, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and SunTrust Bank
Petitioner:
Howard Appel
Mary Nealy v. SunTrust Bank, et al
as 21-11358
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK and SUNTRUST BANK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY NEALY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
