Cases 31 - 40 of 99
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01088
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAH OMAR-SHARIF MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66122
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SHAH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44976
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HINA SHAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Katie Waidmann
Defendant:
Dr. Saurin Shah, ADVANCED RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES, LLC, MI MEDICAL SPA, LLC and others
Jones v. Shah
as 6:2019cv02354
Defendant:
Nikesh Shah
Plaintiff:
Shanita Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Lee S. Kosby Trust v. Muehlhaeuser et al
as 8:2019cv02209
Plaintiff:
The Lee S. Kosby Trust
Defendant:
brian r GAMACHE, Haresh Shah, HUBERTUS M MUEHLHAEUSER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
v. Shah et al
as 0:2019cv61979
Defendant:
Digant Shah, Costco Wholesale Corporation and Seema Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shah et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 0:2019cv61981
Plaintiff:
Seema Shah and Digant Shah
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mata Chorwadi, Inc. et al v. City of Boynton Beach et al
as 9:2019cv81069
Plaintiff:
Kirit Shah, Dipika Shah and Mata Chorwadi, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Boynton Beach and Gregory Cafaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Murena v. Shah et al
as 3:2019cv00856
Defendant:
Sujata Shah, Bhavana Babulal Shah, Eric Shah and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dante Murena, as Receiver of Zilmil, Inc. and Kenneth Dante Murena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
