Cases 31 - 40 of 238
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. J & E CAR CARE INC. et al
as 9:2022cv81815
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
J & E CAR CARE INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as MEINEKE SHOP 2714 and 319 E. BOYNTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis, Jr. et al v. City Of Boynton Beach et al
as 9:2022cv81773
Plaintiff:
Stanley Davis, Jr., Shannon Thompson and Estate of Stanley Davis, III
Defendant:
City Of Boynton Beach and Mark Sohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caplan v. FLORIDA TIRE SHOP LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81785
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
FLORIDA TIRE SHOP LLC and 319 E. BOYNTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
BOYNTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21025
Plaintiff:
DONALD BOYNTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wing Ho, et al v. City of Boynton Beach
as 22-11542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WING KEI HO and HO YEH KAREN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
BOYNTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08665
Plaintiff:
HARRY W BOYNTON, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
