Cases 31 - 40 of 196
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37015
Plaintiff:
JORDAN E SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19360
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ramsey et al
as 3:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Officer Ramsey and Corporal Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Captain Marty Reeves and Angela Woodie
Plaintiff:
Mr. Sandy E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SMITH JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sadler v. Mesa et al
as 5:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah Aldin Yussuf Ibn Ayyub
Defendant:
Florida Clinical Laboratories, Inc, Louis A. Vargas, FNU Hugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96056
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70064
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BROOK E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56465
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50070
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN E SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
