Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Birch et al v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61664
Defendant:
Imerys USA, Inc., Imerys Minerals USA, Inc., Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc. a/k/a The Procter & Gamble Company and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Birch and Robert Birch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02119
Plaintiff:
Charles B Meeks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heskett v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 4:2017cv02118
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Heskett
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavatorta v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02117
Plaintiff:
James E Cavatorta
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELLEGRINO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv05148
Plaintiff:
CHARES PELLEGRINO
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatovic, Curtis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04706
Plaintiff:
Curtis Beatovic
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flood v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04261
Plaintiff:
Amy Flood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03268
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Inc. Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bachmann v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00910
Plaintiff:
Marc Bachmann
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02738
Plaintiff:
Martin Garcia and Carmen Garcia
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
