Cases 31 - 40 of 273
CRUTCHLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Officer JACKSON and Officer NESMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v PAULK
as 7:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v GILES et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
THOMAS P GILES, TAE JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
JAMARILLO-ROCHA v. MADRIGAL et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
YURIDIA JAMARILLO-ROCHA
Defendant:
Francisco Madrigal, Thomas P. Giles, Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
CHESTNUT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 7:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CHESTNUT
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and Warden PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torrieo M. Johnson v. Warden Paulk
as 22-12342
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORRIEO M. JOHNSON, a.k.a. Torrieo Monte Corker
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN PAULK
CHESTNUT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 7:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CHESTNUT
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and Warden PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOHNSON v. PAULK
as 7:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
TORRIEO M JOHNSON and TORRIEO MONTE CORKER
Respondent:
Warden PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SIMMONS v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
KEVIN SIMMONS
Respondent:
Warden PAULK and UNITED STATES MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
