Cases 31 - 40 of 58
JAMES v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24513
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and AUTONATION USA OF PERRINE INC.
Plaintiff:
FOX JAMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FOX v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24514
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOX, JR
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., AUTONATION USA OF PERRINE, INC. and AUTONATION USA OF PERRINE, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation, doing business as Autonation Nissan Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ocomo et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv22740
Plaintiff:
Amber Perrin and David Ocomo
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Ocomo et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv22758
Plaintiff:
Amber Perrin and David Ocomo
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Amato v. Palm River MHP, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Diane D'Amato
Defendant:
Palm River MHP, LLC and Raymond Perrine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Perrin v. Sunset Investors LLC et al
as 0:2017cv60777
Plaintiff:
Luc Perrin
Defendant:
Sunset Investors LLC and M/Y Reel Wheels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Barberi v. Dream Cars South, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv20912
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Dream Cars South, Inc. and Perrine 17403, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barberi v. Benalva Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv20874
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Benalva Corporation and Perrine Service Station, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barberi v. D & R Auto Service & Shop Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv20875
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
D & R Auto Service & Shop Corp. and L& M Perrine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
