Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
State of Georgia, et al v. Administrator, U.S. Environmen, et al
as 15-13252
Petitioner: STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent: ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS), in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
State Of Georgia et al v. McCarthy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00079
Plaintiff: State Of Georgia , State of West Virginia , State of Alabama and others
Defendant: Regina A. McCarthy , Jo-Ellen Darcy , United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Hurt v. The State of South Carolina
as 1:2014mi00022
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant: The State of South Carolina
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
Michael Singleton v. State of South Carolina
as 12-11749
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Singleton v. The State of South Carolina
as 1:2012cv00586
Petitioner: Michael A. Singleton
Respondent: The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caldwell v. U.S. Treasury Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv20459
Plaintiff: Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant: U.S. Treasury Dept., Office Comptroler of Currency State of South Carolina Probate Code Title 62, Irwin Condon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zey v. State of South Carolina et al
as 1:2011cv03006
Defendant: State of South Carolina, North Charleston Police Department and Ninth Judicial Circuit
Plaintiff: Michael P. Zey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Department of HHS, et al
as 11-11021
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Pam Bondi Attorney General, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through Alan Wilson Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, HR POLICY ASSOCIATION, PHILIP E. BERGER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?