Cases 31 - 40 of 113
Lane v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk)
as 8:2021cv02806
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Lane
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AITKEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, MARK INCH and S PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Steven Marks
as 21-13319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL MARKS
HINESLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42320
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL HINESLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Niederhofer
as 2:2021cv14334
Defendant:
Steven Michael Niederhofer
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134
Niederhofer v. United States of America, d/b/a The United States Postal Service/Post Office
as 2:2021cv14333
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Niederhofer
Defendant:
United States of America, d/b/a The United States Postal Service/Post Office
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134
Niederhofer v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv14335
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Niederhofer
Defendant:
No United States of America d/b/a The United States Postal Service/Post Office and United States of America doing business as United States Postal Service/Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
KAPPES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37273
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL KAPPES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Araque v. Mann Mechanical Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02456
Plaintiff:
Steven Araque
Defendant:
John Does #1-3, Steven Michael China, ABC Corps. #1-3 and others
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25800
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
