Cases 31 - 40 of 76
THOMPSON v. KNIGHT
as 4:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
ALVIN C THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD L KNIGHT, J YATES, HAROLD ARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. RUMMEL et al
as 3:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
DURECO K BROWN
Defendant:
W D RUMMEL, D MCGOWAN and M NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS v. CREWS
as 3:2013cv00541
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LAMONT M SUMMERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, W D RUMMEL, M NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASH v. OAKES et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE B ASH
Defendant:
B OAKES, W D JOHNSON, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVIN C THOMPSON v. RICHARD L KNIGHT et al.
as 3:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
ALVIN C THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD L KNIGHT, J YATES, HAROLD ARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2013cv00384
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, W D RUMMEL, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAFAEL GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEDDER v. RUMMEL et al
as 3:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WESLEY TEDDER
Defendant:
W D RUMMEL and MARCIA NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javado Thompson v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 13-11272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVADO AUDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. NICHOLS, ARNP, W. D. RUMMEL, MD CHO and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
JACOBS v. COMERFORD et al
as 3:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
JARVEY JACOBS, JR
Defendant:
R COMERFORD, W D RUMMEL, S ENFINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKBURN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2012cv00626
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BLACKBURN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA , JOHN PALMER, JOHN WHITFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
