Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. East 15th Street, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv01833
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
East 15th Street, Inc. , Michael S. Bennett and Diane M. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
CADENCE BANK N A v. BLUFFS AT THE CAPE LLC
as 4:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Defendant:
BLUFFS AT THE CAPE LLC, BOOTH HOLDINGS BOOTH TRUST LLC, BOOTH HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
CADENCE BANK N A v. APALACHICOLA RESORT DEVELOPMENT et al
as 4:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Defendant:
APALACHICOLA RESORT DEVELOPMENT , AVENUE I HOLDINGS LLC , RIVERSIDE HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Austin Creek, L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Austin Creek, L.L.C.
Receiver:
GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Glazer, et al
as 1:2012cv20312
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Robert Glazer, Sheldon Schultz and Ina Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADENCE BANK N A v. MANAUSA HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Defendant:
MANAUSA HOLDINGS LLC , MICHELLE MANAUSA, JOSEPH P MANAUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADENCE BANK N A v. PARKWEST LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Defendant:
PARKWEST LLC , RYAN ADAMS , ANTOINE BOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADENCE BANK N A v. AUSTIN CREEK LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00027
Defendant:
AUSTIN CREEK LLC , AMB DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION LLC and ANTOINE M BOULOS
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADENCE BANK N A v. FOUNTAIN BROOK LLC
as 3:2010mc00094
Plaintiff:
CADENCE BANK N A
Defendant:
FOUNTAIN BROOK LLC and WILLIAM R HYNEMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
