Cases 41 - 50 of 432
Garrett v. Glaxo Smith Kline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19595
Plaintiff:
Valencia Garrett (Ken Curry Estate) and Valencia Garrett
Defendant:
Glaxo Smith Kline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Currie v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv18171
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Currie
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05823
Plaintiff:
ROCKY CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
CURRIE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05085
Plaintiff:
RACHEL CURRIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04588
Plaintiff:
DONTEL CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv10905
Plaintiff:
Samuel Curry
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. HILL et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
RUSS G THOMAS
Defendant:
HILL, BEARDEN, DARVESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03291
Plaintiff:
COSMO MILTON CURRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CURRIE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02413
Plaintiff:
SEAN OLIVER CURRIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
