Cases filed in Florida
Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Defabbi v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00069
Plaintiff: John Defabbi, Jr.
Defendant: Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00013
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv02154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vazquez v. Aaron's, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv03059
Plaintiff: Amanda Vazquez
Defendant: Aaron's, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Archer v. City of Winter Haven et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03067
Plaintiff: Darrell Archer
Defendant: City of Winter Haven, Winter Haven Police Dept., Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01314
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv62389
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Psychic Readers Network, Inc. v. LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv62267
Plaintiff: Psychic Readers Network, Inc.
Defendant: LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc. , Benefit Cosmetics, LLC , The Eighth Floor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spy Optic Inc. v. Islam Brothers International, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv01541
Plaintiff: Spy Optic Inc.
Defendant: Islam Brothers International, Inc. , Pattar Enterprise, Inc., SNR Petroleum, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?