Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Merritt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv02501
Petitioner:
Paul Wayne Merritt
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Florida Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VALE v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 4:2011cv00501
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VALE
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, B PEARSON, RICK ESTRELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAMBERS v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 5:2011cv00319
Petitioner:
HERMAN CHAMBERS
Respondent:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Orange County Board of Commissioners, et al
as 6:2011cv01580
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Orange County Board of Commissioners, Orange County Corrections Department, Jeremy Gatzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Peter et al
as 9:2011cv81010
Plaintiff:
Paul Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Peter, Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALE v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 5:2011cv00265
Petitioner:
WILLIE F HALE
Respondent:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and EDWIN G BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCLUSTER v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2011cv00357
Petitioner:
RAYMOND MCCLUSTER
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL and FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darby v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Petitioner:
Luqman Darby
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Florida Parole Commission and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Florida Parole Commission
as 0:2011cv61129
Plaintiff:
Keith Richard Harris
Defendant:
Florida Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZEIGLER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 4:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R ZEIGLER
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, ERIKA DAVIS, WALTER A MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
