Cases 41 - 50 of 51
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 14-10281
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnny Gregory v. Robert Adams, et al
as 13-13639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT B. ADAMS, Superior Court Judge, Whitfield County, PAT GIDDENE, Clerk, AMBER WINKLER, Civil Clerk's Office of Whitfield County and others
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 13-12138
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Johnny Gregory
as 12-14255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Johnny Gregory v. Robert Adams, et al
as 12-14197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT B. ADAMS, Superior Court Judge, Whitfield County, PAT GIDDENE, Clerk, AMBER WINKLER, Civil Clerk's Office of Whitfield County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Type:
Other Statutes
Gregory v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Robert B. Adams, Pat Giddene, Amber Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Adams et al
as 4:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
Robert B Adams, Pat Unknown, Amber Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00142
Petitioner:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gregory v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00147
Petitioner:
Johnny Brett Gregory
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
