Cases 41 - 50 of 343
National Labor Relations Board v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 23-11340
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
as 23-11076
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court Broward County, et al
as 23-10913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT BROWARD COUNTY, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, FL, et al
as 23-10916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, BROWARD COUNTY, FLA, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Reinier Angulo v. The Shyft Group Usa, Inc., et al
as 23-10927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REINIER ANGULO
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHYFT GROUP USA, INC., WORKHORSE CUSTOM CHASSIS, LLC, NAVISTAR, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 23-10758
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
PerDiemCo LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023mi00009
Plaintiff:
PerDiemCo LLC
Defendant:
CalAmp Corp.
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
