Cases 51 - 60 of 363
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Nathanael Blackmon and Nathaniel Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Florida State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Florida State Prison, Mark Inch, Warden Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Capt. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Capt. Smith, L.T. Aikin, L.T. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Don Davis, R. Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19930
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17802
Plaintiff:
ERIC PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ingram v. Phyail et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Phyail, F. Perry, J. Idlerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00942
Petitioner:
Steven R. Phelps
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
