Cases 51 - 60 of 429
Rothenberg v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rothenberg
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
GVA GROUP, INC v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE GENERAL SERVICES CO
as 1:2023cv20061
Plaintiff:
GVA GROUP, INC
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE GENERAL SERVICES CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 3:2022cv21526
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 3:2022cv21524
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Open Sea Distribution Corp. v. TForce Freight Inc.
as 3:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Open Sea Distribution Corp.
Defendant:
TForce Freight Inc. and TForce Freight Inc. d/b/a United Parcel Service, a foreign for-profit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Liability of Carriers Under Receipts and Bills of Lading
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
