Cases 51 - 60 of 368
GS Holistic, LLC v. Orlando Luya, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Orlando Luya, LLC doing business as Up In Smoke, De Hua Chen, Qiongchun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
YZY, Inc. v. CHEN et al
as 0:2022cv61855
Plaintiff:
YZY, Inc.
Defendant:
DAVID CHEN, BAI SONG CHEN and USA FEILONG INT'L TRADIING CORP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
CHEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18669
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JASON CHEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Wei Chen v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD
as 1:2022cv22869
Plaintiff:
Qi Wei Chen
Defendant:
NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Curity AB et al v. Chen Tech, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv22654
Plaintiff:
Curity AB and Curity I/O AB
Defendant:
Chen Tech, LLC and ChenMed, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
CHEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13710
Plaintiff:
YUSZU CHEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Menashe et al v. Abou Jaoude et al
as 1:2022cv22220
Plaintiff:
Natalie Menashe, R.M., Estate of Amir Menashe and others
Defendant:
Georges Zard Abou Jaoude, Mohamad Hamdoun, Ahmad Safe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
