Cases 61 - 70 of 19,654
Clarence McKinney v. Warden, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11611
Petitioner:
CLARENCE MCKINNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
In re: Salvatore Cordovano
as 24-11607
Petitioner:
In re: SALVATORE P. CORDOVANO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Don Ferguson
as 24-11605
Petitioner:
In re: DON T. FERGUSON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Culver, Dominique v. State of Florida
as 2:2024cv14157
Plaintiff:
Dominique Culver
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
Jonathan Robert Hawkin, The State of Florida, Paul Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kitt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11561
Petitioner:
DAVID M. KITT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jerry Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11563
Petitioner:
JERRY L. PARKER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Shaffer v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaffer
Respondent:
Chad Chronister, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Fetzer v. Administrator, Florida Civil Commitment Center, et al
as 24-11531
Petitioner:
DANIEL FETZER
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA CIVIL COMMITMENT CENTER
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, JON CARNER and STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
