Cases 71 - 80 of 608
AHC Ventures Corp. v. Coetzee et al
as 0:2023cv60527
Plaintiff:
AHC Ventures Corp. d/b/a Cryoderm and AHC Ventures, Corp. a Florida corporation doing business as CRYODERM
Defendant:
Abraham Izak Coetzee, Samtastic LLC, Schmuel Barski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEVASH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
ELI JASON DEVASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAYTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
ALANA PAYTON, COLE M. RADICIC, MATTHEW WHELIHAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hollenback et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
as 1:2023cv20725
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hollenback, Matthew Johnson, Aaron Namaki and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, ROBINHOOD SECURITIES LLC and ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ELIE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04420
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ELIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez Cruz v. Laufer et al
as 1:2023cv20708
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Eli Laufer and Jesse Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
JACOB ELI HAYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
