Cases 71 - 80 of 438
Haynes v. Nugent et al
as 3:2014cv00680
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Daniel W. Nugent and Mr. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. U.C.I. Personnel et al
as 3:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Personnel, U.C.I. Warden, F.S.P. Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. Kralle et al
as 3:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Daryl Cortez Black
Defendant:
Sergeant Kryoz Kralle, Lieutenant Austin, Inspector General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. Inspector General Office et al
as 3:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Daryl Cortez Black
Defendant:
Inspector General Office, Lieutenant Austin and Charlotte Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes et al v. I.C.T. Team of FSP et al
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Saleem Shamsidden
Defendant:
I.C.T. Team of FSP, A. Anders, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. F.S.P. Personnel et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
F.S.P. Personnel, F.S.P. Warden Mr. Palmer and L. Wing Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. F.S.P. Security et al
as 3:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
F.S.P. Security, Nugent Daniel, F.S.P. Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. State Classification et al
as 3:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
State Classification, Daniel W. Nugent, F.S.P. Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Wilis et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Officer Wilis, Wing Sergeant, F.S.P. Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. State Classification Office of F.S.P. et al
as 3:2014cv00363
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
State Classification Office of F.S.P., F.S.P. Personnel, F.S.P. Warden Mr. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
