Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 283
Inmon v. Tucker
as 0:2012cv61857
Plaintiff: Leroy Inmon
Defendant: Kenneth S. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferguson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv01036
Plaintiff: John Ferguson
Defendant: John Palmer , Kenneth S. Tucker and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLETT v. TUCKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00445
Petitioner: GERMAINE GILLETT
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STALEY v. TUCKER
as 4:2012cv00471
Plaintiff: NEGUESSE P STALEY
Defendant: KENNETH S TUCKER , C HALLEY, S HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DISHMAN v. TUCKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00485
Petitioner: WILLIAM R DISHMAN
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. TUCKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00208
Petitioner: SAMUEL WHITE
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAGWOOD v. COMERFORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00442
Plaintiff: BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Defendant: R COMERFORD, C BISHOP, P NATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEDER v. TUCKER
as 0:2012cv61765
Petitioner: RICHARD LEE REEDER
Respondent: Kenneth S Tucker and Attorney General of the State of Flordia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDNEY v. TUCKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00460
Petitioner: DARRYL M EDNEY
Respondent: KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greg Nelson v. Kenneth Tucker
as 12-14562
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREG C. NELSON
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH S. TUCKER, In His Individual and Official Capacities

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?