Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Phan v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phan v. Capital One Bank et al
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Northland Group, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Phan v. DTG Holdings, Inc
as 3:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
DTG Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Phan v. Check Plus Systems, L.P.
as 3:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
Check Plus Systems, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Phan v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv00888
Petitioner:
Van Trong Phan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Phan v. RJM Acquisitions, LLC
as 3:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
RJM Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Phan v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
as 3:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
General Produce, Inc. v. International Farmers Market I, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00551
Plaintiff:
General Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
International Farmers Market I, L.P. and Fonzie A Phan
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
