Cases 81 - 90 of 93
USA v. Noel Arnold
as 11-13618
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NOEL ARNOLD, Pop
USA v. Ernest Mallety
as 11-12804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST MALLETY, a.k.a. Pops, a.k.a. Cooneye
Chau Mann, LLC v. Sushi Pop, LLC
as 6:2011cv00282
Plaintiff:
Chau Mann, LLC
Defendant:
Sushi Pop, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Sushi Pop, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Chau Mann, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chau Mann, LLC v. Sushi Pop, LLC
as 2:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chau Mann, LLC
Defendant:
Sushi Pop, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jonathan Riches v. Michael Jackson, et al
as 10-14236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d.b.a. Bernard Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JACKSON, f.k.a. King of Pop, a.k.a. Jackson 5, FARRAH FAWCETT, LISA MARIE PRESLEY and others
Jonathan Riches v. Michael Jackson, et al
as 10-14236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d.b.a. Bernard Madoff
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL JACKSON, f.k.a. King of Pop, a.k.a. Jackson 5, FARRAH FAWCETT, LISA MARIE PRESLEY and others
Colony Insurance Company v. Pop et al
as 1:2010cv23157
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jaime Osvaldo Pop and Carson Overseas Trading, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv80227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bailey v. European R & C Automotive, Inc. et al
as 9:2009cv81576
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Bailey
Defendant:
European R & C Automotive, Inc. and Razvan Pop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Boily et al v. Walt Disney World Company et al
as 6:2009cv00792
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Boily, Mary M. Boily, Valmore P. Boily and others
Defendant:
Walt Disney World Company, Pop Century Resort, ABC Companies (I-X) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
