Cases 81 - 90 of 22,361
Clark v. DeSantis et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv01130
Petitioner:
Robert Abraham Clark
Respondent:
Ron DeSantis and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bolling v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Desi Eugene Bolling
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jamell M. Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11472
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11522
Petitioner:
CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
