Cases 1 - 10 of 1,650
Bautista v. Heavenly Foot Massage, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv02393
Plaintiff:
Nelyda Yanira Ramirez Bautista
Defendant:
Heavenly Foot Massage, Inc, Lu Alpharetta Massage, Inc, Lu Dunwoody Massage, Inc and others
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ramirez v. Heartland Payment Systems, LLC
as 1:2024cv22091
Plaintiff:
Evan Ramirez
Defendant:
Heartland Payment Systems, LLC doing business as MySchoolBucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ramirez v. Advance Auto Parts et al
as 0:2024cv60905
Plaintiff:
Millye Ramirez
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts and Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Ramirez v. Shein US Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv22002
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ramirez
Defendant:
Shein US Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Trexis One Insurance Corporation v. Moreno et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Trexis One Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Sebastian Moreno and Joani Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ramirez Romero, Jose R. v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60875
Plaintiff:
Jose Ricardo Ramirez Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Exceen v. PlushCare, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Chad Exceen
Defendant:
PlushCare, Inc. and M.D. David Ramirez
Other:
Stacy Estes Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Yilian Ramirez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11064
Petitioner:
YILIAN QUINTANA RAMIREZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
