Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FLETCHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04379
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C FLETCHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fletcher v. Valdez et al
as 5:2019cv00308
Plaintiff:
Donavon C. Fletcher
Defendant:
Manuel Ramirez Valdez and Eagle Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
PRICKETT v. FLETCHER
as 5:2018cv00210
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MARTIN, C FLETCHER and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JOSHUA PRICKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conraad Hoever v. C. Fletcher, et al
as 16-15862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant - Appellee:
C. FLETCHER, Officer in Charge Captain, M. MILLETTE, Classification Officer and V. WATSON, Officer in Charge Lieutenant
Conraad Hoever v. J. Bockelman, et al
as 14-13917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BOCKELMAN, Classification Officer, J. CHISHOLM, Hearing Office Lieutenant, C. FLETCHER, Officer in Charge Captain and others
HOEVER v. BOCKELMAN et al
as 4:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
J BOCKELMAN, J CHISHOLM, C FLETCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOEVER v. FLETCHER et al
as 4:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
C FLETCHER, M MILLETTE and V WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOEVER v. CARRAWAY et al
as 4:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
C CARRAWAY, JANE DOE, C FLETCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOEVER v. CREWS, et al
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
CONRAAD L HOEVER
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, R HOSFORD, E WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
William C. Fletcher and William C. Fletcher
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
