Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Barberi v. One Cap, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22592
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
One Cap, Inc. and Michael B. Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Choice Cap, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04731
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Choice Cap, Inc. , Sung Kwan Park , Retail Royalty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Retail Royalty Company et al v. Choice Cap, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02085
Plaintiff:
Retail Royalty Company and AE Outfitters Retail Co.
Defendant:
Choice Cap, Inc. and Sung Kwan Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Northside Exxon Corporation v. Syn-Cap Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03679
Plaintiff:
Northside Exxon Corporation
Defendant:
Syn-Cap Inc. , Tracey R. Lewis and John Doe # 1 - 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barber and Company of Odum, Inc. v. Choice Cap, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
Barber and Company of Odum, Inc.
Defendant:
Choice Cap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richey v. Ghods et al
as 1:2008cv01364
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Richey and Thomas S. Richey
Defendant:
Zahra Ghods, Rusa Cap, Inc., Unisource Cap, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Boston Life and Annuity Company Ltd. v. Dijon Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2007mc20169
Plaintiff:
Boston Life and Annuity Company Ltd. and Boston Life and Annuity Company Ltd.
Defendant:
Dijon Holdings Limited, International Association for Professional Benefits Inc., Employers International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
