Cases 1 - 5 of 5
TANGLE, INC. v. THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO
as 0:2022cv62289
Plaintiff:
TANGLE, INC.
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, Anxin Xueyu Business Co., Ltd. (1), Dongguan Everest Technology Co., Ltd. (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Crazy Forts Inc. v. THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
as 1:2023cv20776
Plaintiff:
Crazy Forts Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A, THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, JML Market, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fendi, S.r.l. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2022cv60438
Plaintiff:
Fendi, S.r.l.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, bagsiiit, ftboy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
F & G Research, Inc. v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
as 0:2007cv60576
Plaintiff:
F & G Research, Inc.
Defendant:
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
F & G Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
