Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Petrosyan v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Gurgen Petrosyan
Defendant:
David J. Smith, William H. Pryor, Jr. and Marcia Morales Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03897
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
DAVID E SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HEPHZIBAH v. PHILLIPS et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH
Defendant:
JOHN PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH WARREN, TRACI E ABRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tusha v. E2Company et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Simon Tusha
Defendant:
E2Company, James Richmond, Jeanne Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20827
Plaintiff:
DAVID DENARD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20520
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15066
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEWIS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09718
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
