Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Thomas Allen, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-11909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ALLEN and DAVID ELLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Ellis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22545
Plaintiff:
David Ellis
Defendant:
JB Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kaiser Permanente International, Kmart Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77541
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44900
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Tucker et al
as 3:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Shawn Hill
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, David Ellis, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Florida Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
Florida Dept of Corrections, Kenneth S. Tucker, S. Milliken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
KEITH J POWELL
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER and DAVID ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery Souffrant v. David Elli
as 10-15592
Petitioner - Appellant:
AVERY SOUFFRANT
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID ELLIS
Michael Brown v. Thorton, et al
as 10-11473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
THORTON, CO II, TORINO, Nurse, DONAHUE, Nurse and others
Souffrant v. Ellis
as 1:2009cv23183
Plaintiff:
Avery Souffrant
Defendant:
David Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
