Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
PREMO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD PREMO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KRONK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22094
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD KRONK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16824
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Solomon and Solomon P.C.
as 4:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Douglas Edwards
Defendant:
Solomon and Solomon P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
GALLAGHER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14681
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD GALLAGHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HITCHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07772
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD HITCHENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Douglas Edward Bennett
as 22-10464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS EDWARD BENNETT, a.k.a G E
JENNINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58848
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD JENNINGS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55027
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS EDWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
