Cases 1 - 10 of 2,213
Gomez v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Adrian J. Gomez
Defendant:
Antonio Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Mr. & Mrs. Crab St. Pete, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
MADELYN GOMEZ
Defendant:
Mr. & Mrs. Crab St. Pete, Inc. and Mr. & Mrs. Crab Tampa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez, Maximo v. Sergeant Merial et al
as 2:2024cv14156
Plaintiff:
Maximo Gomez
Defendant:
Sergeant Merial and Correctional Officer Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Perez et al v. Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv14138
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Santos Perez, Byron Eduardo Ordon Hernandez, Odaliz Esther Gomez Lopez and others
Defendant:
Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. and Harlan Bast
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mario Gomez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11392
Petitioner:
MARIO GALO GOMEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gomez v. Capital One Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gomez v. N.Y.S. Child Support Processing Center
as 8:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
N.Y.S. Child Support Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
