Cases 1 - 10 of 18
HENKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29784
Plaintiff:
HERMAN HENKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20486
Plaintiff:
RYAN HENKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HENKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02544
Plaintiff:
LOGAN J HENKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zmuda et al v. Austin
as 5:2021cv01668
Plaintiff:
Michael Zmuda, Kyle Brickhouse, Donal Doherty and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20158
Plaintiff:
JASON HENKE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28309
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HENKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27296
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN HENKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
